Suspicious responses to authorship change requests
Suspicious responses to authorship change requests
Question for the Forum
- Given
the concerns about the validity of author D’s emails, how should the
journal and the publisher proceed?
Advice:
The
Forum suggested contacting author D directly by telephone, rather than by
electronic communication. The journal might also consider requesting
handwritten signed agreements from all of the authors.
If the journal’s suspicions
are correct, an expression of concern should be published, and author A’s
institution should be contacted and asked to investigate.
The Forum suggested that
the journal might consider trying to validate the authors by asking for ORCID IDs
from all of the authors or some other form of validation.
Follow up:
The
publisher tried calling author D, but that method proved unsuccessful. After
sending several additional emails, author D finally responded from an
institutional email address, agreeing to the proposed changes, and the journal
published a correction updating the author list. The publisher considers the
matter closed.